Tocqueville's "soft despotism" has arrived via a harder mechanism than he anticipated — not through comfort and apathy alone, but through manufactured cynicism deliberately weaponized to produce that apathy.
Tocqueville didn't anticipate the science of democracy he was at the forefront of would be used against democracy. He was analyzing democracy as a natural phenomenon — trying to understand what sustained it or undermined it from within. The idea that his diagnostic framework would become a toolkit for dismantling the thing he was diagnosing would have been largely outside his conceptual horizon.
There's a direct parallel to other fields. Freud mapped the unconscious as a domain of inquiry; his successors in advertising and public relations — Bernays most explicitly — turned it into an instrument of manipulation. The knowledge of how minds work became the technology for working on minds against their own interests.
With democracy the inversion is particularly sharp. Tocqueville identified the central vulnerability: that democratic citizens, absorbed in private life, could gradually surrender public agency without noticing. He thought the remedy was civic engagement, association, local self-governance — the habits that kept the democratic character alive. What he didn't foresee was that those same habits could be studied, mapped, and then systematically targeted. The science of what sustains democratic character became the science of how to erode it — through manufactured polarization, deliberate destruction of institutional trust, the cultivation of precisely the electoral cynicism as the enabler of passive consent to authoritarian consolidation.
Why have Americans have lost faith in elections? That loss of faith didn't happen organically. It was produced — expensively, deliberately, over decades — by people who understood Tocqueville well enough to run him in reverse.*
And like a subset of public relations, there is the cynical, practical, unbelieving use of fascist techniques by Trump and others to take and hold power.
3.
How then does it look to live in a place and time when the anti-democracy agents, the media, advertising, education, commerce, are in operation to make ready the population for dictatorship? Well, we know that as they say rule of law is over, replaced by law for the rulers; so we keep our heads down and keep moving. And that works, if you can do it. But what if you can't? What if being who you are you are, despite your wishes to the contrary, you are identifiable to strangers for what you are, a non participant. And then? Then there is the successful incorporation of fascism: not just they don't buy what I am selling, the way of life that is different, they are going to use it to recover a sense of power and identity by acting against. About six months ago the supermarket I frequent stopped answering my greetings. The barista at the inside the store cafe explained staff had been instructed to to "acknowledge" me. This later was picked up by employees of other stores. I ignored it, and in time store employees for the most part recovered civility. But up at the University where I used the library the police started paying me visits, 8 times so far this year, on various obviously false pretexts, including the absurd like 'We're looking for someone removing flyers from notice boards,' like 'I caught you looking at me and nodding,' like 'We're investigating a stolen bike (this one 4 times so far), like 'Why are you sitting there on the bench outside the library?' I began to receive other attentions the product I think of this engineered collapse of democracy. One was a woman who would talk hours at a time about the businesses she owned, which were just about every large business in the world, except some that had been stolen from her by a group of shadowy characters, including aliens from space, including members of two royal families who were conspiring against her. She liked to sit down at my cafe table when the man she was living with threw her out of the night, which happened almost every week. Another character was this fellow in Beverly Hills who lived of the rental income, shared with his sister, from a twenty million dollar house, and at age 60 had down pretty much nothing with his life; he spent his time visiting prostitutes, riding along with the sheriff's deputies in a volunteers police like uniform, and telling lying stories including battles in Vietnam he never had anything to do with. His greatest love was harassing his male acquaintances by pretending to be a homosexual and in love with them, sending dozens of emails a day claiming he missed you, asking when he made his reappearance at the cafe table,"what about you and me? producing violent reactions, including the ritual reply, "there's no you and me,"which is what he wanted, achieving an effect like a court jester who offends and discomforts the king with impunity: he enjoyed seeing his victims squirm, enjoyed too his felt independence of the personal attacks he received in response, for every response was for him a recognition of his power. I for one enjoyed my freedom to insult him in more and more creative ways, this relationship a strange efflorescence of decaying democracy. Needless to say, both her and the Beverly Hills rentier were deeply, emotionally attached to the president: asked what they thought about his open criminality, their reply was the same, the better he for getting away with it. On that subject, criminality, the woman of ownership told me that her friends wanted to rob me, thinking I had a lot of money. The next day, sitting at the cafe table with my bike leaning against the railing beside me, a man poorly dressed walked past, turned around walked past again, turned around and walked past but turned and jumped on my bike and rode away. By the time I stood up and grabbed hold of my computer and ran to catch up, at the corner there was no sight of him. I looked around carefully, saw an opening of the hedge that bordered the cafe parking lot. The thief had turned in there and made his escape.
3.
How then does it look to live in a place and time when the anti-democracy agents, the media, advertising, education, commerce, are in operation to make ready the population for dictatorship? Well, we know that as they say rule of law is over, replaced by law for the rulers; so we keep our heads down and keep moving. And that works, if you can do it. But what if you can't? What if being who you are you are, despite your wishes to the contrary, you are identifiable to strangers for what you are, a non participant. And then? Then there is the successful incorporation of fascism: not just they don't buy what I am selling, the way of life that is different, they are going to use it to recover a sense of power and identity by acting against. About six months ago the supermarket I frequent stopped answering my greetings. The barista at the inside the store cafe explained staff had been instructed to to "acknowledge" me. This later was picked up by employees of other stores. I ignored it, and in time store employees for the most part recovered civility. But up at the University where I used the library the police started paying me visits, 8 times so far this year, on various obviously false pretexts, including the absurd like 'We're looking for someone removing flyers from notice boards,' like 'I caught you looking at me and nodding,' like 'We're investigating a stolen bike (this one 4 times so far), like 'Why are you sitting there on the bench outside the library?' I began to receive other attentions the product I think of this engineered collapse of democracy. One was a woman who would talk hours at a time about the businesses she owned, which were just about every large business in the world, except some that had been stolen from her by a group of shadowy characters, including aliens from space, including members of two royal families who were conspiring against her. She liked to sit down at my cafe table when the man she was living with threw her out of the night, which happened almost every week. Another character was this fellow in Beverly Hills who lived of the rental income, shared with his sister, from a twenty million dollar house, and at age 60 had down pretty much nothing with his life; he spent his time visiting prostitutes, riding along with the sheriff's deputies in a volunteers police like uniform, and telling lying stories including battles in Vietnam he never had anything to do with. His greatest love was harassing his male acquaintances by pretending to be a homosexual and in love with them, sending dozens of emails a day claiming he missed you, asking when he made his reappearance at the cafe table,"what about you and me? producing violent reactions, including the ritual reply, "there's no you and me,"which is what he wanted, achieving an effect like a court jester who offends and discomforts the king with impunity: he enjoyed seeing his victims squirm, enjoyed too his felt independence of the personal attacks he received in response, for every response was for him a recognition of his power. I for one enjoyed my freedom to insult him in more and more creative ways, this relationship a strange efflorescence of decaying democracy. Needless to say, both her and the Beverly Hills rentier were deeply, emotionally attached to the president: asked what they thought about his open criminality, their reply was the same, the better he for getting away with it. On that subject, criminality, the woman of ownership told me that her friends wanted to rob me, thinking I had a lot of money. The next day, sitting at the cafe table with my bike leaning against the railing beside me, a man poorly dressed walked past, turned around walked past again, turned around and walked past but turned and jumped on my bike and rode away. By the time I stood up and grabbed hold of my computer and ran to catch up, at the corner there was no sight of him. I looked around carefully, saw an opening of the hedge that bordered the cafe parking lot. The thief had turned in there and made his escape.
__________________________
* Claude Sonnet 4.6 text, edited
